Dug
Jedi Trainee
Offline
In another post, someone was asking about clutch judder. They ran thru a few things but what caught my eye was the statement
"The crankshaft end float is 8 thou (i.e. within spec)"
Not wanting to change the path of the original question, this is being asked here.
Ok, here is one I can't resist asking a group type of question. "If" the acceptable end float of a 948cc thru 1275cc engine is 0.002-0.003 with full 360 degrees thrust washer contact at the main cap. How is 0.006-0.014-end float on a 1500 engine with only 180 degrees found to be ok?
Is this one of the main reasons the 1500 was prone to connecting rod failure? Is it also why the 1500's have such a history of spinning the thrust washers?
My feeling is yes. I’d be freaked with 0.008-end float.
Anyone of 1500cc knowledge know a reason why the factory manuals list so much clearance and range? And why when you look in a Spitfire manual the end float is listed as less than the end float given in most MG manuals for the same engine?
"dug"
"The crankshaft end float is 8 thou (i.e. within spec)"
Not wanting to change the path of the original question, this is being asked here.
Ok, here is one I can't resist asking a group type of question. "If" the acceptable end float of a 948cc thru 1275cc engine is 0.002-0.003 with full 360 degrees thrust washer contact at the main cap. How is 0.006-0.014-end float on a 1500 engine with only 180 degrees found to be ok?
Is this one of the main reasons the 1500 was prone to connecting rod failure? Is it also why the 1500's have such a history of spinning the thrust washers?
My feeling is yes. I’d be freaked with 0.008-end float.
Anyone of 1500cc knowledge know a reason why the factory manuals list so much clearance and range? And why when you look in a Spitfire manual the end float is listed as less than the end float given in most MG manuals for the same engine?
"dug"