The one piece retainer fits the inner spring perfectly, but not the two piece retainer. No bottom collars were on this head, and I'm not terribly worried about that, I seen and ran way too may examples on race engines without them, a very common happeing for alot of builders using different valve spring packages, and with this engine an the inner spring ID being so close to the guide OD, it can't go anywhere. Moss shows the one piece retainer as N/A, BPNW offers a alloy dual spring retainer, to be honest with you, I didn't even think of Charles at TRF, thanks for reminding me.
As for as the valve springs, they are the new stock dual spring offering that BPNW sells, they were already on the head when I got and you can clearly see they are new, so I have nothing to compare them to, but would love it if someone can provide info there, thats why I'll be talking to David Anton tommorow, most guys on the forum are not building there own heads and have no way to weight valve springs, but Im all ears if you have first hand experiecne with this. There's a few things that come into play with seat pressures, the valve spring being used, the installed height, the size of the valve in a given engine and the cam, 60 pounds is way low for this engine, I'd be afraid the valve would float at higher rpms. I agree that .100" is alot of shim, but that far from the norm on some engines, but if it gets me to the seat pressure I need to be at and I don't have coil bind at full lift, then there's no issue with the thickness of the shim. In fact valve shims are most commonly offered in .060", .030", and .015", and it not that uncommon to use a .060" and a .030 shim together to achieve the desired seat pressure, so .010" more is not that much of a stretch from the norm.
As for having something under the spring on a head to keep the spring form digging in, sorry I do not agree with that, and that opinion is based on decades of experience. It's very common in race engine to have a race valve spring that seat and over the nose pressure is at the limit of the most you can have on a given engine, so no shim is used, and because it it a spring that may not be stock OD, no bottom locating collar is not use either. I had to refresh these heads over time and never saw any evidence of the valve spring damging the spring pad on the head, but with this engine that would be a moot point anyway, because there will be a shim on the bottom between the spring and spring pad on the head, so the spring would never touch the head anyway.
Ok, first off, this engine is not a engine I built from the start, but one I'm re-doing for a customer who had it done by a so-called Triumph experts, but the .004" main clearnece and the .003" rod clearence he had , would not let the engine develop hot oil pressure, that's why I'm redoing this engine, because the original builder could not quote his clearences, and that is the only thing I found worng with the engine that would equate to a oil pressure issue. Ok, with that being said alot of the new parts in this engine were not bought by me, but by the original builder, now I did get a detailed list of all of those parts, and where he got them. The camshaft used in this engine is a new (not reground) BP270 suppiled by BPNW, after talks with Leyton at BPNW asking him for cam specs for this cam, so I could degree the cam, he emailed the cam spec page for the new BP270 cam, these cams are done by Piper in the UK, ok to say the specs were vauge would be a enormous understatement, no cam ground on center line was givien, no recommended cam timing was offered, just some goofy deal about where to align the crank gear and cam gear to achive correct timing and even then no quote as to what it should be when checked, and no recommended seat pressure for the springs as well were given, this is why when it comes to cams I use APT, David knows his stuff, and gives you all the correct info to do your job properly, and all his cams and lifters are properly hardened and have the needed Rockwell C numbers, in short I hate to use UK cams in my engines, because they are so vauge with their specs, and normally just don't do things to the level I want, so I use APT anytime I need a cam for these engines. Now I do buy alot of parts form BPNW and find them to be great guys, it's just when it comes to cams ahd lifter, I go to the souce, and that for me is APT.